Artists Against the Incandescent Lamp Ban

Posted May 5, 2010 // Tagged as Blog // 30 Comments ↓

An influential group of artists recently published the following statement in the Neue Westfalische newspaper in Germany. Thanks to PLD Magazine for translating this and sending it to me.

Painter Georg Baselitz, designer Ingo Maurer and around 100 other renowned artists, designers and architects continue to demand that the EU Parliament decision to phase out the incandescent lamp be revoked. Baselitz claims that he and his colleagues from the world of art and design do not want to have to forfeit being able to choose exactly what light they can use, or how their works of art are illuminated, saying that the incandescent lamp is a key part of the overall lighting culture. And he adds that halogen lamps are indispensable when it comes to the illumination of art, architectural spaces, stages and facades.
Since people have started using so-called energy-saving lamps, the consumption of energy in private households has risen, as experts predicted. According to the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: “When the heat dissipated by conventional incandescent lamps is reduced, the missing warmth is compensated for by the central heating system”. The savings effect is thus zero – the money saved on lighting is spent on increased heating costs.
On 22. April, 2010 the artistic activists from German-speaking Europe filed a petition with the European Commission in Brussels: “We artists, exhibition designers, museum curators, architects and designers cannot accept the EU phasing out the incandescent lamp”.

We demand the decision to phase out the incandescent lamp be revoked:
Volker Albus, Georg Baselitz, Hilla Becher, Stephan Berg, Daniel Birnbaum, Christian Boros, Marc Brandenburg, Arno Brandlhuber, Mark Braun, Joachim Brohm, André Buchmann, Daniel Buren, Anthony d’Offay, Thomas Demand, Marie-Theres Deutsch, Jörg Ebers, Clemens Fahnemann, Harald Falckenberg, Yvonne Fehling und Jennie Peiz, Thomas Florschuetz, Ceal Floyer, Hubertus Gaßner, Ingvild Goetz, Bärbel Grässlin, Thomas Grässlin, Durs Grünbein, Andreas Gursky, Nanette Hagstotz, Mathias Hahn, Jitka Hanzlová, Harald Hauswald, Eberhard Havekost, Wulf Herzogenrath, Julian Heynen, Candida Höfer, Carsten Höller, Klaus Honnef, Janneke de Vries, Gregor Jansen, Ann Veronica Janssens, Daniel Josefsohn, Johannes Kahrs, Astrid Klein, Barbara Klemm, Hans Kollhoff, Karola Kraus, Mateo Kries, Mischa Kuball, Daniel Lergon, Veit Loers, Philomene Magers, Ingo Maurer, Andreas Mühe, Heike Munder, Carsten Nicolai, Jennie Peiz, Susanne Pfeffer, Tobias Rehberger, Anselm Reyle, Bernhart Schwenk, Werner Spies, Monika Sprüth, Urs Stahel, Julia Stoschek, Katja Strunz, Thomas Struth, Hadi Teherani, Matteo Thun, Rosemarie Trockel, Philipp von Matt, Michael Werner, Thomas Weski, Robert Wilson, Rein Wolfs, Beat Wyss, Felix Zdenek, Ralf Ziervogel, Michael Zimmermann, Armin Zweite

Source: Neue Westfälische newspaper

30 Responses

  1. peter

    May 10th, 2010 at 10:54

    Interesting, thank you for that
    it seems the dissenting voices are mostly heard in Germany …..
    only Germans on the EU environment Committee where active against the ban,
    only in Germany did a bulb manufacturer get worried about
    pre-ban losses suggesting a tax alternative
    http://www.megaman.de/downloads/pmstoppglverbot.pdf
    – and of course there was the Greenpeace Hamburg commissioned Klaus Stanjek study here
    http://www.savethebulb.org/Energy%20Wasting%20Lamps.pdf

  2. Joe Kiddle

    June 18th, 2010 at 09:19

    It’s a good point and there are a lot of people who are going to lose out because of the ban. We made sure at Ryness that we were stocked up to keep giving people the option of which bulb they would prefer.

    Lots of people have come in to our stores expressing a desire to stock up on old light bulbs for their old lamps or chandeliers.

    Although energy saving bulbs, especially LEDS are getting better, there are still many people worried about having to make the switch.

    As I said we still have lots in stock, but how much longer is a bit of a worry.

  3. Ron Lentjes

    August 12th, 2010 at 15:10

    I totally support NOT banning incandescents. I am a scientist/aritsy type combined -best way to describe it. They are looking at Watts only. 3 types: incandescent / fluorescent / LED. Every light has its use. LED great for displays indoor and outdoor like clock displays speed signs so on. Shit for ambient lighting. Fluorescent is ok for ambient lighting in office but it is a VERY AGGRESSIVE light and some students have trouble concentrating under them. When you come home from harsh lighting of fluoresents I strongly suggest INCANDESCENT as it is a health, warm, relaxing (some of this is subconscious) and should be used in homes. I thing CFLs should NOT be used in homes at all. I can only see this leading to lots of stress than some people may not realize. I also do photography. Incandescents light up areas in a way no other light can. DIfferent works of air / paints should be lit accordingly. You should have a CHOICE. You can’t take a way a CATEGORY of light!! Don’t make customers so angry they have no more choise in proper lighting. OK, you going to ban white sofas? Now we can’t enjoy black leather sofas. Oh but you say white ones are more efficient. The EU has a lack of ability to understand HUMAN FACTORS. They are applying mathematics to a human factor situation. SHAME ON THEM. Give the customer / artist the choise. Now that Australia is banned, it is a SICK place to visit. My favorite pubs / bars / restaurants / so on all have these ALFUL CFLS that totally WRECK the atmosphere. EU get a grip. Learn about humans. Stop being such SOALESS creeps! You are screwing up your planet!

  4. central heating replacement

    September 6th, 2010 at 08:57

    Hey, ……you have a great blog here! I’m definitely going to bookmark you!