Canada rolls back the incandescent ban!

Posted May 25, 2011 // Tagged as Blog // 5 Comments ↓

In response to massive negative public response to legislation that mirrors the USA the ban has been put on hold until at least 2014. As pointed out elsewhere the colder the country and the more non fossil fuel electricity that exists the poorer the environmental argument is for swapping incandescent lamps for CFLi. With a particular concern for other environmental impacts, particularly mercury emissions and other waste, Canadian legislators have realised that the existing arguments are not appropriate for Canada. They also cite the speed of change has not allowed for full technological development of either higher efficiency incandescent lamps or other light sources.

There is an interesting parallel here with the situation in New Zealand where, at the last minute, they rejected playing follow my leader with the Australian ban and sought to make decisions appropriate to their situation. I hope that this move in Canada will allow other countries peripheral to Europe to make their own decisions and not capitulate to ill considered legislation dreamed up in the massive and often ill informed legislatures of the major world players.

Kevan Shaw 25 May 2011

5 Responses

  1. Larry French

    May 25th, 2011 at 17:45

    Hello Kevin!

    Are there news articles about this? Have you followed what Howard Brandston is doing? Hope all is well.

  2. peter

    May 26th, 2011 at 14:07

    Larry
    re more information
    you may find http://ceolas.net/#li01inx useful:
    US, California, Canada, B.Columbia (and EU, Australia) legislation
    CBC news article and official information link to Canada delay proposal
    updates on US House/Senate, S. Carolina, Georgia, Texas, Minnesota and Arizona repeal Bills

  3. peter

    May 26th, 2011 at 17:12

    Re “the ban has been put on hold until at least 2014″

    Unfortunately it’s only up for consultation as yet
    Some even say it was just an election gambit by the
    prime minister, who after all decided on the ban some years back

    I talked to John Cockburn
    (see http://savethebulb.org/the-american-debate )
    He is collecting submissions on the issue
    He will then put together a presentation to the government
    in July or so.
    I think they will likely decide in the autumn (the fall)

    Don’t want to sound too negative about it,
    the Canadian media seem to assume a delay,
    but given also the federal US pressure on individual states
    attempting a repeal of the ban,
    one can expect the same kind of US pressure on Canada during the summer
    (incidentally mirroring how the EU behaves towards
    Norway, Switzerland and Iceland)

    The political – industrial machine behind this ban
    is going to take some stopping, at least with the current US
    (and EU) political administrations in place
    Hopefully I am wrong….

  4. peter

    May 27th, 2011 at 10:28

    Canada Government Open Invitation to Comment on
    Canadian Ban Delay Proposal:
    Before June 30th 2011
    http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2011/2011-04-16/html/reg1-eng.html
    Comments to: John Cockburn equipment@nrcan.gc.ca
    Telephone: 613-996-4359
    .

  5. peter

    November 19th, 2011 at 18:29

    Delay is now official…
    some links and observations on it
    http://freedomlightbulb.blogspot.com/2011/11/canada-delay-to-2014-its-official.html

    In the wake of this decision,
    notice that in British Columbia (which have a ban),
    the Conservatives are now also promising to defer/cancel the ban if they gain power
    CBC article ( http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/11/16/bc-cummins-incandescent-ban-delay.html )
    Policy release ( http://bcconservative.ca/2011/11/cummins-reverse-the-ban-on-100-watt-and-75-watt-incandescent-light-bulbs/ )

    Re
    There is an interesting parallel here with the situation in New Zealand where, at the last minute, they rejected playing follow my leader with the Australian ban
    good point

    Re the colder the country and the more non fossil fuel electricity that exists, the poorer the environmental argument is for swapping incandescent lamps for CFLs
    good points too…
    there are indeed several reasons why bans in Canada (and other such regions) are wrong
    http://ceolas.net/#li11x
    .

Leave a Reply